Another Royal cock-up?

By Russell Bruce

Possibly quite literally, if a widely-reported motion to a Florida court is found to have any substance.

The Florida case, details of which were revealed by the Guardian on Friday and followed up worldwide, includes a motion lodged by lawyers acting for four women who claim they were used as underage ‘sex slaves’ by Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender and multi-millionaire investment banker.

The  ‘royal’ named in the papers is Prince Andrew, described by the Daily Mail Online as a ‘former friend’ of Jeffrey Epstein, who was convicted in 2008 and served 13 months of an 18 month sentence following a plea bargain in a related case.

Now lawyers for the four women argue their rights, as victims, were not taken into account when the plea bargain was negotiated.

The Mail Online published a picture of Prince Andrew with Jeffrey Epstein, taken in New York in 2011. Prince Andrew was ‘relieved’ of his controversial UK trade ambassador role in 2011, reputedly over his contact with Epstein and other controversial figures. Why the Prince chose to maintain contact and be seen in public with a convicted sex offender as recently as 2011 does seem unwise.

The Guardian contacted Buckingham Palace before running the story and were told the royal household would “never comment on an ongoing legal matter”

Then within an hour of publication Buckingham Palace, in an unprecedented decision, issued the following statement:

“This relates to long-running and ongoing civil proceedings in the United States to which the Duke of York is not a party. As such we would not comment in detail. However, for the avoidance of doubt, any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue.”

The FBI started to investigate Epstein in 2006, and according to the Guardian, Federal Prosecutors had identified 40 of Epstein’s young victims by the following year.

In 2008 following legal arguments, and allegedly on the advice of Epstein’s friend, Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, a plea bargain was arranged. He pleaded guilty to a single ‘minor offence’ of soliciting sex with a minor – a 14 year old girl. As a result, the federal case was dropped.

Last July, lawyers, acting for two of the victims, succeeded in arguments to obtain access to the plea bargaining papers. The new submission to the Florida court is on behalf of two further victims and it is one of these, – identified only as Jane Doe 3, who has made accusations involving Prince Andrew and others.

Jane Doe 3, whose identity the Guardian says it knows but has agreed to keep anonymous, claims her contact with Epstein started when she was 15 and that she was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of the late and unlamented publishing fraudster Robert Maxwell.

The Guardian reports: The motion alleges that Maxwell “was one of the main women whom Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities”. With Maxwell’s assistance, the document alleges, Epstein converted the girl into a “sex slave”, repeatedly abusing her in his private jet or his lavish residences in New York, New Mexico, Florida and the US Virgin Islands.

The motion further argues that Ghislaine Maxwell was a co-conspirator and also participated in the abuse and “had direct connections to other powerful individuals with whom she could connect Epstein”.

Enter stage left Prince Andrew. “The document lists three locations where the woman alleges she was forced to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew: Maxwell’s London apartment, Epstein’s private Caribbean island in what was allegedly “an orgy with numerous other under-aged girls”, and an undisclosed location in New York.”

The Guardian report concludes with a final paragraph” The woman’s lawyers allege in their motion that, in addition to facilitating her alleged encounters with the prince and Dershowitz, Epstein trafficked her to “many other powerful men, including numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well-known prime minister, and other world leaders”.

Professor Dershowitz – famous as the defence attorney in the O.J. Simpson murder trial -has denied any involvement in underage sexual activities in an interview with Politico Magazine. I will not speculate on who these other important people might be, but another interesting part of the court motion reads:

“One clear example is Request for Production No. 8, which seeks documents regarding Epstein’s lobbying efforts to persuade the Government to give him a more favorable plea arrangement and/or non-prosecution agreement, including efforts on his behalf by Prince Andrew and former Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz. Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 have alleged these materials are needed to prove their allegations that, after Epstein signed the non-prosecution agreement, his performance was delayed while he used his significant social and political connections to lobby the Justice Department to obtain a more favorable plea deal. See, e.g., DE 225 at 7-8 (discussing DE 48 at 16-18). Jane Doe #3 has directly person knowledge of Epstein’s connection with some of these powerful people and thus how Epstein might have used them to secure favorable treatment.”

So not just a case of who you know, but maybe also what you know about them?

Buckingham Palace,’s reactive statement said little in reality, but the last sentence is very specific.

“However, for the avoidance of doubt, any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue.”

The Palace is neither confirming nor denying that Andrew had sex with Jane Doe 3.

The age of consent in Florida is 18. Jane Doe 3, the Independent reports, was understood to be 17 at the time of the alleged encounters which are claimed to have taken place in London, New York and a private Caribbean island belonging to Epstein.[1]

Contrary to speculation, nowhere in the motion to the court does it suggest the wandering Prince Andrew forced her to have sex with him. The allegation is that Epstein forced her to have sex with important people including Prince Andrew.

Whether the allegation has any substance , only time will tell.

 

[1] The age of consent is 16 in London and 17 in New York State. The Caribbean island owned by Jeffrey Epstein is understood to be one of the islands in the US Virgin Islands. The US Virgin Islands are the former Danish West Indies bought by the US in 1916. They are described in US law as an organized and unincorporated United States Territory. Under US Federal Law the age of consent is 18, but this may not apply in an unincorporated territory.

Advertisements

About russellbruce

Writer, journalist and blogger. Worked in advertising and publishing. Former board member Loch Lomond National Park Authority, Chair of Borders Writers' Forum
This entry was posted in Politics, Royal family and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s